Community Service Argument Essay

Network Service Argument Green Bay High Schools are being confronted with an extremely disputable issue, which spins around whether network administration hours are expected to graduate. Secondary schools are contending that 24 hours of network administration are expected to move on from their office of learning, yet many disappointed understudies are voicing fights to this interest. This circumstance has caused a lot of discussion among the educational system and numerous contentions have ascended in help and against this network administration issue. Supporters of the network administration venture contend that if understudies satisfy their 24 hours of network administration in secondary school they will form into upstanding mainstays of the network. They accept that understudies will turn out to be better mindful of what this present reality resembles by doing network administration and offering back to their locale. Understudies will learn important life exercises by partaking in network administration and will like themselves for helping other people out of luck. Protestors have hit back with an extremely strong contention. They feel that if secondary school understudies are compelled to do network administration they will start to consider it to be a discipline and as something that they need to do in light of the fact that it is required as opposed to something that they need to do on the grounds that it is the proper activity. Understudies will later on glance back at the network administration extends that they had to do a ll through secondary school and will keep on conveying a negative point of view toward network administration for the sum of their lifetime. Another thought that the protestors give about this network administration issue is time imperatives will make it near unimaginable for secondary school understudies to fill the vital 24 hours expected to graduate. Secondary school understudies have a tremendous measure of things going on in their lives. They go to class day by day for 7 hours, partake in extra-curricular exercises, and have low maintenance employments. Secondary school understudies have such a constrained measure of time for themselves, as it is that by attaching some other tedious venture like network administration is strange. Supporters contend back that secondary school understudies just need to satisfy 24 hours of network administration all through 4 years, that truly isn’t soliciting a mess from time duty. In the event that understudies financial plan their time and start the network administration when they are a green bean all they have to do is an hour each other week and they will in any case be don eâ with every year or so to save. A last disputable issue that springs up is transportation. The protestors contend that green bean and sophomores in secondary school don't have their driver’s permit, so how are they expected to get to their locale administration site when their folks or companions are grinding away or just to occupied to give them a ride. Except if the school offers a methods for transportation for the understudies there truly is no answer for this issue. The supporters contend that understudies can discover network administration extends near and dear or in the event that they live in the nation discover another understudy to vehicle pool with. Constraining understudies to finish 24 hours of network administration in secondary school so as to graduate is an exceptionally disputable issue. The two sides have strong contentions concerning why network administration ought to or ought not be constrained upon understudies. Network administration is a magnificent thing that everybody ought to be required to do sooner or later in their life, yet are secondary school understudies full grown and dependable enough to take on network administration ventures at this phase in their life?

The Rash Romeo in Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet Essay -- William Shake

The Rash Romeo in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet In the play Romeo and Juliet, Romeo’s activities are imprudent all through the play. For instance, Romeo doesn't consider the outcomes of his activities when he demands wedding Juliet. Additionally, Romeo shows thoughtlessness when he executes Tybalt. At long last, Romeo is imprudent when he executes himself. Imprudence is a quality that frequents Romeo all through the play. One of Romeo’s acts that shows his imprudence is his wedding Juliet. After Juliet says that she wouldn't like to wed Romeo, he perseveres and says that he needs â€Å"Th’ trade of thy love’s dedicated promise for mine† (2.2.134). Romeo doesn't think about the outcomes of their marriage. He just needs his desire satisfied. He is imprudent in light of the fact that he needs to race into a marriage for which he isn't prepared. Romeo’s carelessness continues all through the play and prompts his defeat. Another case of Romeo’s rash character is the point at which he executes Tybalt. Romeo’s family is informed that on the off chance that they battle with the Capulet family, they will be executed. Tybalt of the Capulet family battles with Mercut...

Come together (and eat)

Come together (and eat) Okay, I must really be starved for questions if Im now answering comments I read in other blogs. But I saw one I just couldnt resist over in Mollies neck of the woods (Note: as I am being greedy and co-opting Mollies question, and as her answer probably differs from mine, she should feel free to provide her own answer). Sara Campbell asked Its cool that MIT has so many food opportunities, but do you feel that it causes people to be too spread out? Im used to a dining hall culture, where you can walk in anytime and find some friends to sit down with, and I feel like Id be lost with all those options! Does MIT compensate and have other places that bring everyone together? Thats a good question, and one I hear a lot from non-MIT people and prospective students. In order to understand the answer, its necessary to understand a little more about dining at MIT. The way it works is, there are a few dorms with dining halls. I believe these are Next House, Baker, Simmons and McCormick. If you live in one of these dorms, youre required to buy a dining hall meal plan, in which you get discounted meals but in order to break even, you need to eat an awful lot of meals in a dining hall. Notice that I said a dining hall, not the dining hall, because if you have a plan at one of these dining halls, its good for all of them. So if you live in Next and youre tooling problem sets with your friend at Baker, you dont have to walk all the way back to eat; just grab your meal at Baker! Some of the FSILGs (fraternities, sororities, and independent living groups) have not been so keen on the mandatory nature of these dining hall plans. Why do they care? Because many of them have their own meal plans, where meals are either cooked by a chef/cook or by house residents, depending on the house. Ive eaten house dinners at four different FSILGs (see my entry where I ate at pika), and the quality of the meals has been quite high. House meals, and especially house dinners, are usually considered to be important community time for the house (if youre still confused as to why the FSILG houses care about dorm dining halls, remember that freshmen, including those affiliated with FSILGs, are required to live in dorms, and if they live in dining hall dormsyou can probably see the conflict). Not in an FSILG, but have a bunch of friends who are? Or maybe, theres one youre thinking about joining? Want some good food and conversation? Some FSILGs allow non-members to purchase a half o r full meal plan. But what if youre not in a dorm with a dining hall or an FSILG? Well, theres plenty of MIT dining spots not connected with a living group (such as the Student Center options), or you can go out to eat. But before you decide to do that, remember that most living groups in this category have large, well-furnished kitchens, where you can cook your own food (which is cheaper than buying it). East Campus is an example of such a dorm, and each of its ten halls has a big kitchen. And most residents cook for themselves. Many people get the wrong impression from this setup, and believe that individuals cooking for themselves are losing an important opportunity for community building. These people are underestimating the power of a kitchen. On 5th East, where I live, the kitchen opens into the larger and more popular of the two hall lounges, as you can see on this floor plan (G509 is the kitchen, G507 is the lounge). During the evening, theres a steady flow of people between the kitchen and the lounge. If you wander into the kitchen to cook dinner, youll likely find other people waiting for their dinners to cook, sitting or standing around the kitchen and animatedly discussing/debating why their 6.001 projects dont work, what the proper definintion of twinkie is, or whether it would be possible to build a giant fire-breating head for Rush (some of the most interesting conversations Ive had have been in the hall kitchen). As the food finishes cooking, they trickle back into the lounge, where the same s ort of conversation is going on but with the participants sitting on couches and the TV going in the background. Some of the Cultural Houses in New House have a sort of middle-ground setup where theres not a formal meal plan but everyone cooks together in the kitchen and enjoys the fruits of communal labor. My point is that missing out on dining halls doesnt mean missing out on community. If you tried to tell FSILG residents, or Cultural House residents, or 5th East residents, that their communities would be better off if they used dining halls and meal plans, I guarrantee you theyd be very offended. In fact, this has happened before. A few years ago, MIT decided to have a mandatory meal plan for all undergrads in dorms. MIT was afraid that students were missing out on a great chance to come together in their communities by not having mandatory meal plans. Students were very unhappy about this. They protested. A lot. And mandatory meal plans were dropped. The mere mention of them causes some people to start breathing fire. In short, Sara, no, I dont feel that our dining system causes people to be too spread out. I think its a great community-builder, with the added benefit that students are allowed to make their own decisions. And I bet thats a longer answer to your question than you expected or wanted. :-) Hmm. In all this talk about dining, I didnt get to the second part of the question, which was about common spaces for all students. I guess thatll have to wait for another entry